Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
u will say, how about they dun give out dividend, in this case, then gent share also will not get any dividend, gent lent so much money to privatise, at the end no any return, in order dun wan give dividend to 20% sturborn shareholder which they hard to collect their share after delist, they dun pay dividend for themself (80%), do u think they will allow this to happened?
so before delisted, u think retailer has influence in the decision making? the situation before and after is same, sure got regulation to protect me, let say dividend, if they want to give themselve dividend, they also need to force to give me, the is the law
after delist, big shark will be very hard to collect more share to reach 90%, cause no more panic sell from retailer, if he dont want to pay dividend in future to me, mean he also cannot pay dividend to his own 75%-80% share, then genting share will dump caused spend so much to privatised but no any return, so in other word, gent get dividend, i will also stil get dividend
i am buy in high price and planning to wait for delisted and become sdn bhd shareholder, see what will happen next, after delisted, big shark also cant manipulate the price to scare out the retailer, if big shark want to buy my share, have to 1 by 1 send letter to retailer to ask for sell with reasonable price, if not reasonable, retailer can reject, i am curious tat time how big shark can collect more share from retailer without manipulate share price to scare them out, i take my own risk
and then i can choose to refuse again, i see how they can get my share, thats all, i bet they cant reach 90% and force me to sell my share, worst case i kept it and pass to my son in future, so what? if they can reach 90% and force me sell, ok they win, but i bet they cant as long as got other minor shareholder like me still holding and no sell
